The Tech Library: Supporting Practical Application
The Tech Library is specifically designed for practical use in Division 4 activities, which include the Academy and the HGC (Hubbard Guidance Center). In these areas, it is essential to have a single, stable reference point that determines the valid materials for use in training and auditing. For any student or auditor, there needs to be a clear understanding of which version of a bulletin or policy is to be applied in day-to-day practice. This decision—choosing the correct reference for study or for use in a session—is typically made by the Snr Case Supervisor or the LRH Communicator to ensure that students and auditors are working from the correct, up-to-date materials.
In practical terms, the Tech Library excels in providing a streamlined user interface for students and practitioners. The user can easily access key materials in the original language paralleled with the translated versions, and it integrates transcripts with lectures seamlessly. This functionality is vital for keeping auditing and training sessions aligned with the current, correct standards.
The Qualifications Library: A Resource for Research and Archival Reference
In contrast, the Qualifications Library, offered through this project, is intended for Division 5, which serves a very different purpose. The Qualifications Library is not meant for everyday application in auditing or training but is a resource for research and historical study. It contains all versions and revisions of each reference work, from the original publication to the most recent.
The purpose of this library is to allow for deeper research and understanding of how a particular policy or bulletin has evolved over time. This can be particularly important for C/Ses, researchers, or any individual who wants to explore the full progression of a reference—from its initial release to its latest revision. The Qualifications Library makes it possible to compare different versions of a text with just a few steps, enabling users to see how and why revisions were made.
This type of work is inherently more academic and investigative than the practical focus of Division 4’s Tech Library. It is designed to provide all relevant data for anyone who needs to research the historical context and revisions made to LRH’s works. Whether it’s a student interested in researching the development of a policy, or a researcher looking to understand the rationale behind various revisions, this library provides the tools necessary for such scholarly work.
It is essential for KSW:
In the HCO Policy Letter of 7 February 1965, Keeping Scientology Working, Ron gave us Scientologists these duties:
Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology.
Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.
Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology.
Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application.
Later in the same policy, he warns us:
Seven is done by a few but is a weak point.
Eight is not worked on hard enough.
Nine is impeded by the "reasonable" attitude of the not quite bright.
Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity. … Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be very alert to Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.
This responsibility is yours, it cannot be delegated to anyone else, not to RTC nor even to higher levels of international Management.
Complementary Roles, Different Purposes
It is important to emphasize that both libraries are equally necessary, but they are not interchangeable. The Tech Library’s focus is on ensuring the smooth, effective delivery of training and auditing, with a strong emphasis on using the current, valid version of any reference material. Meanwhile, the Qualifications Library focuses on preserving the full history of each work, making it available for in-depth study, research and decisions.
Each library serves its respective division’s needs: Division 4 relies on the Tech Library for a clear, reliable source of the most current materials, while Division 5 utilizes the Qualifications Library to maintain a comprehensive archive of all versions for detailed analysis. Together, they ensure both the stability of current operations and the preservation of Scientology’s rich historical record.
By acknowledging these differences, it becomes clear that the two libraries are not in competition but serve distinct, complementary functions that are critical for the continued success and integrity of the organization.
This understanding of the division between the Tech Library and the "Qual Library" highlights the need for both. While the "Tech Library" ensures precise application in everyday training and auditing, the Qualifications Library ensures that the entirety of LRH’s legacy is available for research and comparison, for KSW.